Here's a recap of posts related to the Spring Church IT Event (aka Roundtable)
Participant Feedback (and lessons for future events)
April 17, 2007: Roundtable day
Another set of notes that hasn't been cleaned up yet
• What should a Knowledgebase look like?
• Just one place (or just one search)
• "intentional" knowledgebase
• Where should "disaster recovery" documentation sit?
• Jot service.
• How do you deliver training to the user at the time they need it? (in a form they need it)
• JasonL: don't assume complete self-service. Train and reinforce with backup materials.
• JasonL: "Top 15 nuggets" to know about {whatever}
• Mike Gold: user-generated content. Educational training. Provide tools to the user departments to create the tools to train the next person. Use the excitement of video/podcast type delivery.
• JasonL: What is the baseline for hiring?
• TonyM: New hires: 4 hour orientation, approx 2 are IT related
• Mike Gayle: full day orientation for new staff; all HR. Then "levels of training" to get permission to use the next level. "Super user" training: train-the-trainer within the specific area. Provide certificates upon completion.
• Train on church database, etc., "at their level." 2-hour blocks seem to work (even if real training takes 8 hours total) camtasia for video training
• Video, PPT, synched: table of contents, fast forward capabilities. Be sure to specify that you're a ministry/non-profit for a great discount.
• Peer support vs. super-user support. Expect that the super-user is part of the training department
• Invest in pre-training as you approach major roll-outs (Office 2007, for instance)
• How can we share training resources with each other?
• How do we avoid the location specific issues? How do we create a partnership?
• Training best practices.
• Even if we can't use the specifics of somebody else's training, there is still a gain from the concepts
• Training Wiki for us to share, with screen shots that can be manipulated. "expect downloading/editing"
• How do you find people with time to be super-users? Mike Gayle has had good success with this!
• Be sure to get supervisor approval before soliciting the potential super-user!
• How do you build the culture of "helping co-workers" (vs. a burden)? Most people want to help.
• Give the super-users more rights. More trust, more rights, more training, and so on.
• Distributed expertise -- facilitate the entire organization by having the experts in multiple places.
• How do you help a user think it's their great idea?
April 17, 2007: Roundtable day
Oops, didn't get these cleaned up. Here's the notes in very raw form -- hope to replace it soon.
PamM: xServe in the rack! Communications and Media Arts hitting that server. AD integration - easy! Macs can get to PC shares, but not vice versa. PCs can "see" xServe files. "too much administration"
Discussion: imaging, administration. Different departments needing access to videos. No SAN, yet. Previously, MACs had trouble getting to PC shares. Fear: this is the PC network, this is the MAC network.
JasonL: why xServe instead of AD extensions?
PamM: using it for streaming
Discussion: not using xServe for imaging
JohnD: Integrating Mac onto PC network is automatically an issue. Mapping to home directories was fairly easy. Perimeter limits users to particular PCs they can log into. Randomly creating a PC login problem: MACS randomly choose another host name. Solve by going into hosts file. (go back to your unix days) "and then it just works"
Mike Gold/discussion: using ProTools? Some pain. Authenticating with AD. ProTools seems to break the AD authentication. Trace: ADmitMac - domain join (same people as Dave). Not cheap. Resolves printing through Windows print servers (if there are print drivers). Would this work with PaperCut?
JasonL: Centrify. Extends AD to allow controlling of Mac environment. Similar to GPOs. $1500 for 10 Macs + server license (starting point, at least) Add on that you load onto the Mac. Not clear how much can be pushed from AD to the Mac.
JohnD: reminder that VNC is built into Macs for remote control
Mike Gold: IT support staff going to Mac training (certification program)
JeffreyT: FBA just brought in Macs about 6 months ago. Jeffrey living on one now. Mostly in the Mac world? Maybe.
Discussion: administration. We (IT) must use them! Certification programs. 5 years ago Macs were a question. Now they're an expectation. Harvard CIO on "pure" MAC - no MS-office. How productive can he be? Had to give into Entourage. Didn't like the heaviness of the MAC! A lot of changes since OS 9.x. Creative people want/need the Mac. Personal/productivity, perhaps not.
JasonL/Mike Gold: Cost is about double to by a Mac vs. PC. (much of this is in support costs) Doesn't make sense for basic office apps.
Mike Gold: in the future, the computer becomes like a cell phone, a utility/commodity. The network is the future (Sun: the network is the computer). Also a cultural expression.
JasonL: We need to explain why we choose our tools, why we equip you with different tools, help the user see the value of the different platforms.
Mike Gold: with Vista, PC costs are coming up toward MAC costs. Without using the MS products on MAC, and just using the native tools, the MAC cost goes down.
JasonP: hard rules on "if your job requires X, you get a MAC." Can we get there?
Mike Gold: back to the network. [hopefully] less support of machines and apps, more utilization of the network resources. Consider MS vs. Google.
Discussion: Where to draw the line. "If you need it" is right, but who knows? How does TCO fit in? What is "need?" (video editing, audio editing, Music) Also need to be clear that there will be challenges in a Windows World. North Point does lock down MACs. Apparently nobody else!? Another inequity. Some evidence that Mac users are more tech savvy. (some debate)
JasonL: how do you bring a Mac user along who believes they are a high-end user?
TonyM: use the board; case by case decision
Recent Comments